Hardware & Networking Innovation

admin@vrindawan.in

Hardware & Networking Innovation

Hardware & Networking Innovation

Abstract

Hardware and networking innovations are at the core of the digital transformation reshaping industries globally. With the rapid advancement of technology, organizations are seeking faster, more reliable, and more secure networking and hardware solutions to power high-demand applications such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing. This paper explores the latest trends in hardware and networking, key technologies driving innovation, and practical applications.

1. Introduction

As businesses evolve in response to digital demands, hardware and networking innovations have become critical in supporting these transformations. High-performance computing, secure connectivity, and scalable network infrastructure are increasingly necessary to enable efficiency and support complex applications in real time. This paper examines how hardware and networking innovations are transforming industries, discussing both emerging technologies and real-world applications.

2. The Need for Hardware & Networking Innovation

2.1. Rising Demand for High-Speed Data Processing

The increase in data-driven applications, such as machine learning and real-time analytics, requires powerful processing capabilities and high-speed network connections.

2.2. Connectivity and Scalability

As organizations expand, the demand for scalable and flexible networking solutions grows. Networking innovations such as Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) have allowed organizations to manage networks dynamically.

2.3. Security and Reliability

Cybersecurity threats have become more sophisticated, necessitating advanced network security solutions. Hardware innovations like trusted platform modules (TPM) and network innovations like secure access service edge (SASE) are instrumental in safeguarding data and maintaining reliability.

3. Key Hardware and Networking Innovations

3.1. Hardware Innovations

3.1.1. Edge Computing Devices

Edge computing brings data processing closer to where data is generated. Innovations in edge hardware, such as ruggedized devices for industrial applications and low-power edge processors, enable real-time data processing with minimal latency.

3.1.2. Quantum Computing

Quantum computing, though in early stages, promises significant advancements in data processing speeds. It has the potential to revolutionize fields requiring immense computational power, such as cryptography, drug discovery, and AI.

3.1.3. Advanced CPUs and GPUs

Innovations in CPU and GPU architecture, including parallel processing and reduced power consumption, have expanded hardware’s capability to process large datasets for AI and gaming industries.

3.2. Networking Innovations

3.2.1. 5G and Beyond

5G technology offers increased speed, low latency, and enhanced connectivity for devices, making it essential for IoT and applications in smart cities and autonomous vehicles.

3.2.2. Software-Defined Networking (SDN)

SDN provides a flexible and programmable network management approach, enabling dynamic adjustments to network traffic and improving resource utilization.

3.2.3. Network Functions Virtualization (NFV)

NFV replaces traditional hardware-based network functions with software-based solutions, enhancing scalability and reducing costs for network providers.

3.2.4. Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

SASE integrates networking and security functions, such as firewall and VPN, into a single framework. This innovation supports secure connectivity for remote workers and reduces the need for multiple security tools.

4. Applications of Hardware & Networking Innovations

4.1. Industrial IoT (IIoT)

Hardware like rugged edge devices and 5G connectivity are transforming manufacturing, enabling real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and remote operation of industrial equipment.

4.2. Smart Cities

5G and edge computing support applications such as traffic management, smart energy grids, and real-time surveillance, creating more efficient, sustainable urban environments.

4.3. Healthcare

Wearable devices and IoT-based patient monitoring enable real-time data collection and analysis, improving patient care and supporting telemedicine services.

4.4. Autonomous Vehicles

5G and edge processing enable low-latency communication between autonomous vehicles and infrastructure, essential for vehicle navigation and collision avoidance.

4.5. Cybersecurity

Advanced networking solutions, including SASE and AI-based security systems, enhance data protection and detect potential threats in real time, providing robust security for organizations.

5. Challenges in Hardware & Networking Innovation

5.1. High Costs

The implementation of cutting-edge hardware and networking infrastructure can be costly, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises.

5.2. Regulatory and Compliance Issues

As networking innovations enable more data sharing, organizations must navigate data privacy and regulatory compliance challenges.

5.3. Integration with Legacy Systems

Many organizations face challenges in integrating new hardware and networking technologies with legacy systems, leading to compatibility and performance issues.

5.4. Cybersecurity Concerns

As devices become more interconnected, cybersecurity threats increase. Protecting hardware and networks from potential breaches is essential to maintain the integrity and privacy of data.

6. Best Practices for Hardware & Networking Implementation

6.1. Assess Needs and Prioritize Goals

Organizations should assess their specific needs and establish clear goals to ensure effective investment in hardware and networking solutions.

6.2. Invest in Training

Providing employees with training on new hardware and networking technologies is essential to maximize usage and prevent common operational issues.

6.3. Implement Cybersecurity Best Practices

Organizations must implement robust cybersecurity measures, including data encryption, multi-factor authentication, and network monitoring.

6.4. Plan for Scalability

Investing in scalable solutions, such as SDN and NFV, allows organizations to expand their hardware and networking capabilities as business needs evolve.

7. Conclusion

Hardware and networking innovations are essential for organizations aiming to stay competitive in an increasingly digital landscape. With advancements in edge computing, 5G, SDN, and cybersecurity, organizations can enhance connectivity, scalability, and data security. By prioritizing these innovations, businesses can drive efficiency, support new applications, and provide high-quality services to their customers.

This white paper outlines the importance of hardware and networking innovation, discussing emerging technologies and practical applications across various sectors. Organizations should consider these innovations carefully to maximize the potential of digital transformation in their operations.

What is required Hardware & Networking Innovation

Requirements for Hardware & Networking Innovation

  1. Advanced Technology Infrastructure
    • Upgraded hardware (e.g., high-performance processors, advanced storage solutions) to handle the demands of modern applications.
    • New network architectures like Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) for scalability, flexibility, and efficient resource utilization.
    • Connectivity upgrades, such as 5G or beyond, to enable faster data transmission, lower latency, and enhanced support for IoT and edge devices.
  2. Investment in Edge Computing Capabilities
    • Decentralized computing to bring data processing closer to the data source. This setup reduces latency and enables real-time analytics.
    • Integration of edge devices with low-power, high-performance processors to manage applications locally in sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, and autonomous vehicles.
  3. Enhanced Cybersecurity Measures
    • Implementation of Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions for a unified security approach in networking.
    • Adoption of AI-powered threat detection, anomaly monitoring, and data encryption for more robust protection of networks and hardware devices.
    • Regular security updates and vulnerability assessments to protect against emerging threats, especially in IoT and cloud environments.
  4. Cloud Integration and Interoperability
    • Hybrid cloud systems that blend public and private cloud infrastructure, allowing for flexible resource management.
    • Use of interoperable networking standards and protocols to integrate seamlessly with cloud platforms, enhancing data flow and enabling remote work, cloud storage, and collaboration tools.
  5. Sustainable Hardware and Networking Solutions
    • Energy-efficient hardware designs and practices, like cooling optimization and low-power processors, to minimize environmental impact.
    • Network components designed for a longer lifecycle, with sustainable practices such as modularity, recycling, and energy-efficient protocols to support greener initiatives.
  6. Skilled Workforce and Training Programs
    • Skilled professionals in network management, cloud engineering, cybersecurity, and IoT implementation are essential to innovate successfully.
    • Ongoing training programs to keep IT staff updated on the latest hardware, networking advancements, and security practices.
  7. Scalable Solutions and –Future proofing
    • Scalability in hardware (such as modular devices) and networking configurations to adapt to growing data loads and business needs.
    • Design and investment in infrastructure that supports future technology upgrades and the integration of emerging technologies like quantum computing or AI-driven networking.

By addressing these core requirements, organizations can ensure that their hardware and networking infrastructure is innovative, resilient, and ready to meet the demands of modern and future digital applications.

Who is required Hardware & Networking Innovation

Hardware and networking innovation is required by a variety of entities, each with unique needs and goals for driving efficiency, connectivity, and competitive advantage. Here are some key groups that benefit most from these advancements:

  1. Technology and IT Companies
    • Who: Software developers, cloud service providers, data centers, and tech companies.
    • Why: To enable high-performance computing, secure data storage, and scalable services. Innovations in hardware and networking allow these organizations to deliver faster, more reliable, and cutting-edge solutions to customers.
  2. Manufacturing and Industrial Sectors
    • Who: Factories, industrial facilities, and companies involved in logistics.
    • Why: Edge computing, IoT, and 5G connectivity allow these sectors to monitor operations in real-time, optimize production, and perform predictive maintenance. Networking innovations are critical for remote monitoring, automation, and smart manufacturing.
  3. Healthcare Organizations
    • Who: Hospitals, clinics, telemedicine providers, and health tech companies.
    • Why: Innovations support telemedicine, patient monitoring, and electronic health records. Secure networking solutions and high-performance hardware are crucial for handling sensitive data, reducing latency, and ensuring patient data protection.
  4. Financial Services
    • Who: Banks, insurance companies, and fintech startups.
    • Why: To enhance data security, reduce transaction processing times, and support high-frequency trading and AI-driven customer service. Networking innovations improve connectivity for distributed teams and provide the backbone for real-time data analysis and secure transactions.
  5. Educational Institutions
    • Who: Schools, universities, and online learning platforms.
    • Why: With the rise of e-learning and remote education, innovations in networking and hardware support online course delivery, secure access to educational resources, and efficient data management.
  6. Retail and E-Commerce Companies
    • Who: Online retailers, supply chain operators, and logistics providers.
    • Why: To manage high-volume transactions, enable AI-based customer recommendations, and ensure a seamless online shopping experience. Innovations in networking help maintain uptime and security, while hardware advancements support real-time data analytics and inventory management.
  7. Government and Public Services
    • Who: Municipalities, public health agencies, and defense organizations.
    • Why: To manage smart city initiatives, improve citizen services, and ensure data security for critical infrastructure. Hardware and networking innovations support digital transformation and help agencies serve citizens more efficiently.
  8. Telecommunications Providers
    • Who: Internet service providers, mobile carriers, and network infrastructure companies.
    • Why: To meet growing demand for data bandwidth, improve network speed and reliability, and support technologies like 5G. These innovations enable service providers to offer enhanced connectivity and adapt to future demands in connectivity and data transfer.
  9. Environmental and Energy Sectors
    • Who: Renewable energy companies, utility providers, and environmental organizations.
    • Why: Innovations support smart grid technology, real-time monitoring, and efficient resource allocation. Networking advancements enable reliable communication between distributed energy resources and central management systems.

By embracing hardware and networking innovations, these sectors can drive productivity, improve service quality, enhance security, and remain adaptable to future technology advancements.

When is required Hardware & Networking Innovation

Hardware and networking innovation is required on an ongoing basis, but certain key situations and trends emphasize its importance even more. Here are some of the crucial times when this innovation becomes essential:

  1. During Digital Transformation Initiatives
    • When: Companies adopt cloud computing, remote work, and smart technologies.
    • Why: Upgraded hardware and networking systems enable organizations to handle higher data loads, support remote operations, and deliver fast, reliable service across digital platforms.
  2. When Adopting IoT and Smart Technology
    • When: Implementing IoT systems, smart factories, connected devices, or smart cities.
    • Why: Real-time data transfer, low latency, and secure connections are essential for IoT systems to function effectively. Networking innovations are necessary to ensure devices communicate seamlessly.
  3. To Improve Cybersecurity Posture
    • When: After security audits or in response to cyber threats and regulatory requirements.
    • Why: New hardware and network infrastructure innovations are often needed to protect sensitive data and meet standards, such as zero-trust models and AI-driven threat detection.
  4. When Scaling Business Operations
    • When: Expanding into new markets, increasing employee headcount, or scaling cloud services.
    • Why: Scalable networking infrastructure and advanced hardware can support the expanded user base, increased data traffic, and storage needs while maintaining performance and reliability.
  5. During Technological Advancements (e.g., AI, 5G, Edge Computing)
    • When: As AI, machine learning, and 5G become increasingly mainstream.
    • Why: AI workloads and 5G networks demand high-performance hardware and efficient networking systems that can process and transmit vast amounts of data at high speeds.
  6. To Enhance Customer Experience
    • When: Customer expectations shift toward real-time, personalized, and always-available service.
    • Why: High-quality networking and hardware solutions ensure reliable, low-latency experiences for users, enabling companies to meet customer needs in a competitive marketplace.
  7. During Major System Upgrades or Infrastructure Refreshes
    • When: Aging hardware and outdated network infrastructure need replacement.
    • Why: Regularly updating hardware and network systems helps prevent performance degradation, avoid increased downtime, and address technological obsolescence.
  8. For Sustainable Operations and Cost Efficiency
    • When: Companies prioritize sustainability and energy efficiency.
    • Why: Hardware and networking innovations, like low-power processors and efficient cooling, reduce energy consumption and contribute to cost savings, aligning with sustainable goals.
  9. In Response to Increased Remote Work and Decentralization
    • When: The workforce becomes more remote, decentralized, or distributed.
    • Why: Advanced networking solutions enable secure, high-speed access to data and resources from anywhere, ensuring that teams can work effectively without relying on a centralized physical office.
  10. To Maintain Competitiveness
    • When: New competitors enter the market, or customer demands evolve.
    • Why: Staying current with the latest networking and hardware trends allows businesses to remain agile, reduce costs, and improve service delivery to retain a competitive edge.

In each of these situations, implementing innovative hardware and networking solutions can be the difference between staying competitive and falling behind. This continual innovation enables organizations to adapt and thrive in an increasingly digital and interconnected world.

Where is required Hardware & Networking Innovation

Hardware and networking innovation is required across various environments and industries to enhance performance, connectivity, and security. Here are some critical areas where these innovations are especially essential:

  1. Data Centers and Cloud Infrastructure
    • Where: Large-scale data centers, cloud storage facilities, and server farms.
    • Why: Data centers require continuous innovation to support high data loads, reduce latency, improve energy efficiency, and secure data against breaches. Cloud providers rely on innovative networking for scalability and secure data transfer.
  2. Remote Work Environments
    • Where: Home offices, coworking spaces, and remote access setups.
    • Why: Networking innovations enable secure, reliable, and high-speed connections for remote employees, allowing seamless access to corporate networks and resources from anywhere.
  3. Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities
    • Where: Factories, warehouses, and industrial plants.
    • Why: Innovations in edge computing and IoT networks allow for real-time monitoring, automation, and data analysis, supporting smart manufacturing practices like predictive maintenance and resource optimization.
  4. Healthcare Facilities
    • Where: Hospitals, clinics, and research labs.
    • Why: Networking and hardware advancements enable telemedicine, secure data sharing, real-time monitoring of patients, and management of electronic health records, all critical for modern healthcare delivery.
  5. Smart Cities and Urban Infrastructure
    • Where: Urban areas implementing smart city technology.
    • Why: Innovations in IoT, 5G networks, and edge computing are essential for managing city services like traffic control, public safety, and energy management, all requiring reliable, fast communication between devices.
  6. Retail and E-commerce Platforms
    • Where: Online stores, brick-and-mortar retail chains, and warehouses.
    • Why: Retailers use hardware and networking innovation for real-time inventory tracking, secure transactions, personalized customer service, and supply chain management.
  7. Educational Institutions
    • Where: Schools, universities, and online learning platforms.
    • Why: Networking innovations facilitate e-learning, digital classrooms, and secure access to educational resources. Improved hardware supports high-performance computing for research and data storage.
  8. Telecommunications Networks
    • Where: ISP data hubs, telecommunications towers, and mobile network infrastructure.
    • Why: Networking innovation is critical to support high-speed internet, mobile networks, and the rollout of technologies like 5G, which improve connectivity, speed, and reliability for end users.
  9. Financial Services Sector
    • Where: Banks, trading floors, data centers, and customer support centers.
    • Why: Innovations are necessary to ensure secure, fast, and reliable processing of financial transactions, support real-time analytics, and provide robust cybersecurity for sensitive financial data.
  10. Government and Defense Infrastructure
    • Where: Military bases, government data centers, and emergency response units.
    • Why: Secure and resilient networking solutions are essential for secure communication, data protection, and efficient response in critical areas like national security and disaster response.
  11. Environmental and Energy Sectors
    • Where: Renewable energy sites, smart grids, and remote monitoring systems.
    • Why: Hardware and networking advancements help optimize energy distribution, enable real-time monitoring of renewable energy sources, and improve the management of smart grid systems.
  12. Transportation and Logistics
    • Where: Airports, shipping centers, vehicle fleets, and autonomous transport systems.
    • Why: Networking solutions help track shipments, manage logistics efficiently, and support technologies like autonomous vehicles and drones, which depend on reliable, low-latency communication.

Hardware and networking innovation is required across these diverse environments to support complex data flows, improve operational efficiency, enhance security, and adapt to the growing demands of modern digital systems.

How is required Hardware & Networking Innovation

Hardware and networking innovation is required through several strategies and technological advancements to address the evolving needs of performance, security, connectivity, and efficiency. Here’s how innovation is driven in these fields:

1. Enhancing Data Processing Power and Storage Efficiency

  • Advancements: High-performance computing (HPC), energy-efficient processors, and solid-state storage.
  • Impact: Faster data processing speeds and larger storage capacities support complex computing tasks and improve the speed and efficiency of applications, from AI workloads to big data analysis.

2. Improving Connectivity and Reducing Latency

  • Advancements: 5G/6G networks, edge computing, and low-power wide-area networks (LPWAN).
  • Impact: These networking innovations reduce latency and increase connectivity speed, making real-time data transfer possible in IoT, autonomous vehicles, and smart city applications.

3. Adopting Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV)

  • Advancements: Virtualized network functions and programmable network configurations.
  • Impact: SDN and NFV increase flexibility by allowing networks to be managed, optimized, and configured through software rather than physical components, enabling faster adjustments to network demands and reducing infrastructure costs.

4. Enhancing Security Protocols and Infrastructure

  • Advancements: Zero-trust architecture, end-to-end encryption, and hardware-based security modules.
  • Impact: These measures strengthen network and device security, protecting data from cyber threats and ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. Hardware innovations like secure booting and encryption enhance security at the device level.

5. Increasing Energy Efficiency and Sustainability

  • Advancements: Energy-efficient processors, cooling solutions, and sustainable materials.
  • Impact: Reducing energy consumption in data centers and hardware devices lowers costs and supports environmental goals, while innovations like liquid cooling and efficient power management in processors minimize heat generation and energy use.

6. Facilitating Scalability and Flexibility

  • Advancements: Cloud computing, modular hardware, and hyper-converged infrastructure.
  • Impact: Cloud and modular solutions allow organizations to scale their IT resources based on demand, providing flexibility for businesses to expand operations without needing extensive physical infrastructure upgrades.

7. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Optimization

  • Advancements: AI-driven network management and predictive maintenance.
  • Impact: AI helps automate network management tasks, predict hardware failures, and optimize resource allocation, resulting in fewer disruptions and improved operational efficiency.

8. Advancing Internet of Things (IoT) and Edge Computing

  • Advancements: Edge servers, microcontrollers, and mesh networking.
  • Impact: Placing processing power closer to data sources minimizes latency, which is crucial for IoT applications in real-time environments such as smart cities, industrial automation, and autonomous vehicles.

9. Developing Quantum Computing and Networking

  • Advancements: Quantum processors, quantum key distribution (QKD), and quantum networking.
  • Impact: Quantum technology promises breakthroughs in processing speeds and encryption, offering solutions for complex computations and creating highly secure communication channels for sensitive applications.

10. Improving Interoperability and Compatibility

  • Advancements: Open-source platforms, universal standards, and backward-compatible hardware.
  • Impact: Making devices and networks interoperable allows for a more flexible, collaborative approach across industries, facilitating upgrades and enhancing communication between devices from different manufacturers.

11. Supporting Remote and Hybrid Work Environments

  • Advancements: Virtual private networks (VPNs), virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), and secure remote access solutions.
  • Impact: With these innovations, organizations can maintain secure, high-performance access for remote employees, ensuring that productivity and security standards are met regardless of location.

12. Developing Autonomous and Self-Healing Networks

  • Advancements: AI-based network automation and self-diagnosing hardware.
  • Impact: Self-healing networks can detect, diagnose, and resolve issues automatically, reducing downtime and enhancing reliability. This is particularly valuable for mission-critical applications in sectors like healthcare, finance, and telecommunications.

13. Utilizing Blockchain for Secure Networking

  • Advancements: Decentralized networks, secure blockchain protocols, and smart contracts.
  • Impact: Blockchain technology improves network security and transparency, allowing for secure transactions and data transfers, particularly useful for financial, supply chain, and IoT networks.

Through these innovations, hardware and networking evolve to meet the demands of our increasingly digital, connected, and data-driven world. These strategies ensure that systems remain agile, secure, and scalable for the future.

Case Study on Hardware & Networking Innovation

Here’s a case study example illustrating the implementation of hardware and networking innovation by a multinational company:

Case Study: Cisco Systems’ Networking Innovation in Smart Manufacturing

Background:
Cisco Systems, a leader in networking technology, faced the challenge of helping manufacturers adopt smart manufacturing practices, which involve interconnected devices, real-time data processing, and automated systems. Traditional manufacturing facilities lacked the high-speed connectivity and real-time data transfer capabilities essential for Industry 4.0. Cisco aimed to bridge this gap by developing networking innovations that could support the complex needs of a smart manufacturing environment.

Objective:
To create a robust, secure, and scalable networking infrastructure that supports real-time data transfer, device interoperability, and advanced automation for manufacturers.

Solutions Implemented:

  1. Industrial-Grade Networking Hardware:
    • Cisco deployed ruggedized routers and switches specifically designed for industrial environments. These devices could withstand the harsh conditions often found in manufacturing plants, such as high temperatures, dust, and vibrations.
  2. 5G and Wi-Fi 6 Connectivity for Low Latency:
    • Cisco integrated Wi-Fi 6 and 5G technology within their networking solutions. This high-speed connectivity was essential to enable real-time data transmission between machines, sensors, and control systems, which are critical for automation and monitoring.
  3. Edge Computing and IoT Integration:
    • Cisco implemented edge computing solutions that allowed data to be processed closer to the source, reducing latency and enabling real-time decision-making. This was combined with IoT integration, where sensors and other IoT devices collected and transmitted data for immediate analysis.
  4. Cybersecurity Measures:
    • Given the sensitive nature of manufacturing data, Cisco deployed a multi-layered cybersecurity approach, including AI-based threat detection, encrypted data transfer, and access control measures. This ensured that data was protected from cyber threats and unauthorized access.
  5. Software-Defined Networking (SDN):
    • SDN allowed Cisco to virtualize network functions, enabling flexible and efficient network management. With SDN, manufacturers could prioritize critical data traffic and dynamically adjust network resources based on demand, supporting optimal performance and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Results:

  • Increased Operational Efficiency: The high-speed connectivity and real-time data transfer allowed manufacturers to automate processes, reduce manual intervention, and make data-driven decisions instantly. This led to a 30% increase in production efficiency.
  • Enhanced Equipment Monitoring and Maintenance: The edge computing and IoT sensors enabled predictive maintenance, which allowed equipment issues to be detected and resolved before causing downtime. This reduced equipment maintenance costs by 25%.
  • Improved Data Security: With robust cybersecurity measures in place, manufacturers could confidently adopt digital solutions, knowing that their data was protected. There were no major security incidents reported post-implementation, which reinforced trust in the network infrastructure.
  • Scalability and Flexibility: Cisco’s SDN allowed manufacturers to scale their operations effortlessly and adapt their network configurations as needed, making the infrastructure future-ready for further technology adoption, such as AI and machine learning.

Conclusion:

Cisco’s hardware and networking innovations enabled manufacturers to embrace Industry 4.0, transforming their facilities into smart manufacturing hubs. The case study demonstrates how advancements in networking technology can solve complex industrial challenges, leading to increased productivity, enhanced security, and sustainable growth. This serves as a benchmark for other industries looking to adopt similar innovations for digital transformation.

White Paper on Hardware & Networking Innovation

White Paper on Hardware & Networking Innovation

Executive Summary

Hardware and networking innovations are essential to modern infrastructure, enabling digital transformation across industries. With the rise of cloud computing, IoT, AI, and the demand for real-time data processing, traditional networking and hardware solutions are being rapidly enhanced to meet evolving needs. This paper explores key areas of hardware and networking innovation, detailing recent advancements, use cases, and future trends. It also addresses challenges and opportunities for enterprises, focusing on scalability, security, connectivity, and sustainability.

Introduction

As organizations strive for efficiency, scalability, and security, the demand for innovative hardware and networking solutions has increased. Traditional networking and hardware solutions are being replaced or supplemented by advancements in edge computing, AI-driven networks, 5G, and more robust security measures. These innovations are shaping the next generation of IT infrastructure, supporting business agility and optimizing data processing and storage.

Key Innovations in Hardware and Networking

  1. Edge Computing and IoT Integration
    • Overview: Edge computing decentralizes data processing, placing it closer to data sources to reduce latency and bandwidth usage.
    • Benefits: With edge devices, IoT data can be processed locally, enabling real-time analytics, reduced latency, and lower data transfer costs.
    • Use Cases: Manufacturing, smart cities, and autonomous vehicles, where immediate data processing is essential.
  2. 5G and Wi-Fi 6 for Enhanced Connectivity
    • Overview: 5G and Wi-Fi 6 provide high-speed, low-latency connectivity that supports vast numbers of connected devices.
    • Benefits: These networks enable reliable connections for high-demand applications, such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and IoT.
    • Use Cases: Remote work, telemedicine, and smart factories leveraging real-time, high-bandwidth data transfer.
  3. Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV)
    • Overview: SDN and NFV separate network control and forwarding functions, allowing for flexible, software-driven management.
    • Benefits: These technologies enable dynamic resource allocation, reduced infrastructure costs, and efficient network management.
    • Use Cases: Cloud environments, data centers, and telecommunications networks with high scalability and security needs.
  4. AI and Machine Learning for Network Automation and Optimization
    • Overview: AI-driven solutions in networking help automate network configuration, monitoring, and troubleshooting.
    • Benefits: AI can predict network issues, optimize traffic, and provide predictive maintenance, increasing uptime and efficiency.
    • Use Cases: Large-scale enterprises and data centers that need automated, responsive networking capabilities.
  5. Cybersecurity and Zero Trust Architecture
    • Overview: Zero trust models strengthen network security by treating all network access as potentially untrusted.
    • Benefits: By employing multi-factor authentication, end-to-end encryption, and strict access control, zero trust enhances data security.
    • Use Cases: Financial institutions, government agencies, and healthcare providers managing sensitive information.
  6. Quantum Networking and Encryption
    • Overview: Quantum networking, still emerging, promises near-impenetrable security and speeds for data transmission.
    • Benefits: Quantum encryption methods provide a high level of data security, beneficial for industries requiring secure data exchanges.
    • Use Cases: Future applications in national security, financial transactions, and sensitive data transfers.

Challenges in Implementing Hardware and Networking Innovations

  1. Scalability and Interoperability
    • Many organizations face challenges in scaling and integrating new technologies with existing systems. Ensuring seamless interoperability across platforms and devices is essential for a smooth transition.
  2. Security Risks and Vulnerabilities
    • As networks become more complex, so do the risks. Innovations must include comprehensive cybersecurity measures to protect against data breaches, especially in cloud environments.
  3. Cost of Upgrades and Implementation
    • Innovations often come with a high cost. Businesses must evaluate ROI and consider solutions that balance affordability with functionality.
  4. Skill Gaps in Managing New Technologies
    • The demand for skilled professionals in AI, edge computing, and SDN exceeds supply. Investment in training and development is critical for effective deployment.
  5. Environmental Impact and Energy Consumption
    • The increased demand for data processing and storage requires more energy, raising concerns about sustainability. Innovations in energy-efficient hardware and cooling solutions are essential.

Future Trends in Hardware and Networking

  1. Increased Adoption of Edge and Cloud Hybrid Solutions
    • Organizations will continue blending edge computing with cloud solutions to achieve optimal performance and cost savings.
  2. Expansion of 5G and Private Networks
    • Private 5G networks are likely to grow, especially in sectors like manufacturing and logistics, providing secure, high-performance connectivity for business operations.
  3. AI-Powered Autonomous Networks
    • The continued development of AI in networking will lead to more autonomous networks, where AI handles configuration, security, and traffic management without human intervention.
  4. Quantum Networking Advancements
    • Quantum networking is expected to evolve, particularly for government and financial sectors, to ensure top-level security and performance.
  5. Sustainable Technology Development
    • There will be a stronger focus on reducing energy consumption and environmental impact, leading to innovations in cooling systems, energy-efficient processors, and renewable-powered data centers.

Conclusion

Hardware and networking innovations are reshaping IT infrastructure, creating systems that are faster, more secure, and highly adaptable. As businesses adopt digital transformation strategies, implementing these innovations will be crucial for remaining competitive in a data-driven landscape. By embracing edge computing, AI, and 5G, while also addressing security, scalability, and sustainability, organizations can future-proof their operations and thrive in an interconnected world.

References

  1. Cisco Systems. “5G and Edge Computing in Industry 4.0.” Cisco White Paper, 2023.
  2. Gartner. “Emerging Technologies and Trends Impacting Networking.” Gartner Research, 2022.
  3. McKinsey & Company. “The Role of AI in Networking and Connectivity.” McKinsey Insights, 2023.
  4. IEEE. “Quantum Networking: Emerging Technologies and Use Cases.” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2023.

This white paper provides an overview for decision-makers on leveraging hardware and networking advancements to support organizational growth, security, and sustainability in the era of digital transformation.

  1. Sower, Victor E.; Quarles, Ross; Broussard, Eric (13 February 2007). “Cost of quality usage and its relationship to quality system maturity”. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 24 (2): 121–140. doi:10.1108/02656710710722257.
  2. ^ Feigenbaum, Armand V. (November–December 1956), “Total Quality Control”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 34, no. 6
  3. ^ Feigenbaum, Armand V. (1991), Total Quality Control (3 ed.), New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 109, ISBN 978-0-07-112612-0, OCLC 71640975
  4. ^ Crosby, Philip B. (1979), Quality Is Free, New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 121, ISBN 978-0-07-014512-2, OCLC 3843884
  5. ^ Arnold, Kenneth L. (1994), The Manager’s Guide to ISO 9000, New York: Free Press, p. 244, ISBN 978-0-02-901035-8, OCLC 29845272, The main objective of quality cost reporting is to provide means for evaluating effectiveness and establishing the basis for internal improvement programmes.
  6. ^ Feigenbaum, Armand V. (1991), Total Quality Control (3 ed.), New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 111, ISBN 978-0-07-112612-0, OCLC 71640975
  7. ^ Feigenbaum, Armand V. (1991), Total Quality Control (3 ed.), New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 113, ISBN 978-0-07-112612-0, OCLC 71640975
  8. ^ Feigenbaum, Armand V. (1991), Total Quality Control (3 ed.), New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 130–131, ISBN 978-0-07-112612-0, OCLC 71640975
  9. ^ Juran, Joseph M. (1962), Quality Control Handbook (2 ed.), New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 1–38–1–39, OCLC 64292499
  10. ^ Arnold, Kenneth L. (1994), The Manager’s Guide to ISO 9000, New York: Free Press, pp. 244–245, ISBN 978-0-02-901035-8, OCLC 29845272, External assurance quality costs are those costs relating to the demonstration and proof required as objective evidence by customers, including particular and additional quality assurance provisions, procedures, data, demonstration tests, and assessments (e.g., the cost of testing for specific safety characteristics by recognized independent testing bodies.
  11. ^ Crosby, Philip B. (1979), Quality Is Free, New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 123, ISBN 978-0-07-014512-2, OCLC 3843884
  12. ^ Crosby, Philip B. (1979), Quality Is Free, New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 122, ISBN 978-0-07-014512-2, OCLC 3843884
  13. Compliance, Technology, and Modern Finance, 11 Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law 159 (2016)
  14. ^ Silveira, P.; Rodriguez, C.; Birukou, A.; Casati, F.; Daniel, F.; D’Andrea, V.; Worledge, C.; Zouhair, T. (2012), “Aiding Compliance Governance in Service-Based Business Processes”, Handbook of Research on Service-Oriented Systems and Non-Functional Properties (PDF), IGI Global, pp. 524–548, doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-432-1.ch022, hdl:11311/1029233, ISBN 9781613504321
  15. ^ Norris-Montanari, J. (27 February 2017). “Compliance – Where does it fit in a data strategy?”. SAS Blogs. SAS Institute, Inc. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  16. ^ Monica, A.D.; Shilt, C.; Rimmerman, R.; et al. (2015). “Chapter 4: Monitoring software updates”. Microsoft System Center Software Update Management Field Experience. Microsoft Press. pp. 57–82. ISBN 9780735695894.
  17. ^ Calder, A.; Watkins, S. (2015). IT Governance: An International Guide to Data Security and ISO 27001/ISO 27002. Kogan Page Publishers. pp. 39–40. ISBN 9780749474065.
  18. ^ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspection According to ASME
  19. ^ Malyshev, N. (2008). “The Evolution of Regulatory Policy in OECD Countries” (PDF). OECD. Retrieved 27 July 2018.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Pearson, G. (2009). “Chapter 2: The regulatory structure”. Financial Services Law and Compliance in Australia. Cambridge University Press. pp. 20–68. ISBN 9780521617840.
  21. ^ “Regulatory Responsibility”. ACMA. 17 December 2012. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  22. ^ “What we do”. Clean Energy Regulator. 14 December 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  23. ^ Weinberg, S. (2011). “Chapter 13: International Regulation”. Cost-Contained Regulatory Compliance: For the Pharmaceutical, Biologics, and Medical Device Industries. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 227–258. ISBN 9781118002278.
  24. ^ CompliSpace (14 April 2016). “Compliance Standards ISO 19600 and AS 3806 – Differences explained”. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  25. ^ “AS ISO 19600:2015”. Standards Catalogue. Standards Australia. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  26. ^ Jump up to:a b International Monetary Fund; Financial Action Task Force (December 2008). Canada: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes – FATF Recommendations for Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism.
  27. ^ Jump up to:a b International Monetary Fund (August 2016). Canada: Detailed Assessment Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. International Monetary Fund. ISBN 9781475536188.
  28. ^ Lee, R. (2003). “Chapter 6: Promoting Regional Capital Market Integration”. In Dowers, K.; Msci, P. (eds.). Focus on Capital: New Approaches to Developing Latin American Capital Markets. Inter-American Development Bank. p. 168. ISBN 9781931003490.
  29. ^ Smyth, S.J.; McHughen, A. (2012). “Chapter 2: Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops in USA and Canada: Canadian Overview”. In Wozniak, C.A.; McHughen, A. (eds.). Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 15–34. ISBN 9789400721562.
  30. ^ International Organization for Standardization (December 2014). “ISO 19600:2014”. Standards Catalogue. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  31. ^ Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (14 November 2014). “Revised Guideline E-13 – Regulatory Compliance Management (RCM)”. Government of Canada. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  32. ^ The Handbook of Compliance & Integrity Management. Theory & Practice, Prof. S.C. Bleker-van Eyk & R.A.M. Houben (Eds.), 2017 Kluwer Law International.
  33. ^ “Regulatory Management and Reform in India” (PDF). OECD.
  34. ^ “India Inc has poor record in regulatory compliance | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis”. 2014-10-12. Retrieved 2016-09-18.
  35. ^ “Who We Are”. www.mas.gov.sg. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  36. ^ “Do you need to be FCA authorsied? | FCA application process”. Harper James. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  37. ^ “Check if you need an environmental permit”. GOV.UK. 2020-10-23. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  38. ^ “Waste management licence (Scotland) – GOV.UK”. www.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  39. ^ “Information Commissioner’s Office”. GOV.UK. 2021-06-28. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  40. ^ “Care Quality Commission”. GOV.UK. 2024-06-25. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  41. ^ “Data Protection Act 2018”. August 19, 2024.
  42. ^ “Freedom of Information Act 2000”. August 19, 2024.
  43. ^ “UK Corporate Governance Code”. Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  44. ^ “LR 1.5 Standard and Premium Listing”. FCA Handbook. Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  45. ^ “LR 9.8 Annual financial report”. FCA Handbook. Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  46. ^ “FCA Handbook”. Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  47. ^ “Compliance Challenge: Privacy vs. Security”. Dell.com. Archived from the original on 2011-02-26. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  48. ^ Francis, L.P.; Francis, J.G. (2017). Privacy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. p. PT102. ISBN 9780190612283.
  49. ^ Dale, N.; Lewis, J. (2015). Computer Science Illuminated. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 388. ISBN 9781284055924.
  50. ^ “Special Reports and Discussions on Chapter Eight”. USSC.gov. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010.
  51. ^ The Ethics and Compliance Initiative (ECI). “Principles and Practices of High Quality Ethics & Compliance Programs”. pp. 12–13. Retrieved 31 August 2016.
  52. ^ “Explore Business Tools & Resources”. Business.USA.gov.
  53. ^ “OSHA Law & Regulations | Occupational Safety and Health Administration”. www.osha.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-07.
  54. ^ “Compliance with Diversity Goals Remain Lacking”. Archived from the original on June 3, 2024.
  55.  “Merriam-Webster”. Retrieved June 22, 2013.
  56. ^ Feathers, Michael C. (2005). Working effectively with legacy code. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference. p. 15. ISBN 0-13-293174-5. OCLC 660166658.
  57. ^ Tawde, Swati. “Legacy System”. educba.
  58. ^ (for example, see Bisbal et al., 1999).
  59. ^ This article is based on material taken from Legacy+system at the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the “relicensing” terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.
  60. ^ Lamb, John (June 2008). “Legacy systems continue to have a place in the enterprise”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 October 2014.
  61. ^ Stephanie Overby (2005-05-01). “Comair’s Christmas Disaster: Bound To Fail – CIO.com – Business Technology Leadership”. CIO.com. Retrieved 2012-04-29.
  62. ^ Razermouse (2011-05-03). “The Danger of Legacy Systems”. Mousesecurity.com. Archived from the original on March 23, 2012. Retrieved 2012-04-29.
  63. ^ “Benefits of Mainframe Modernization”. Modernization Hub. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
  64. ^ McCormick, John (2000-06-02). “Mainframe-web middleware”. Gcn.com. Retrieved 2012-04-29.
  65. ^ Menychtas, Andreas; Konstanteli, Kleopatra; Alonso, Juncal; Orue-Echevarria, Leire; Gorronogoitia, Jesus; Kousiouris, George; Santzaridou, Christina; Bruneliere, Hugo; Pellens, Bram; Stuer, Peter; Strauss, Oliver; Senkova, Tatiana; Varvarigou, Theodora (2014), “Software modernization and cloudification using the ARTIST migration methodology and framework”, Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 15 (2), doi:10.12694/scpe.v15i2.980
  66. ^ A.M. Hein (2014), How to Assess Heritage Systems in the Early Phases?, 6th International Systems & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications Conference 2014, ESA
  67. ^ A.M. Hein (2016), Heritage Technologies in Space Programs – Assessment Methodology and Statistical Analysis, PhD thesis Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich
  68. ^ A.M. Hein (2014), How to Assess Heritage Systems in the Early Phases?, 6th International Systems & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications Conference 2014, ESA, p. 3
  69. ^ Lopian, Eli (May 15, 2018). “Defining Legacy Code”. Retrieved June 10, 2019.
  70. ^ Michael Feathers’ Working Effectively with Legacy Code (ISBN 0-13-117705-2)
  71. ^ Ginny Hendry (11 Jul 2014). “Take Pride in Your Legacy (Code)”. Retrieved 2021-10-07.
  72. ^ “Definition of greenfield and brownfield deployment”. Searchunifiedcommunications.techtarget.com. Retrieved 2012-04-29.
  73. ^ “Cost Considerations For A Mainframe to Cloud Migration Project”. Kumaran Systems.
  74. ^ Comella-Dorda, Santiago (2000-04-01). “A Survey of Legacy System Modernization Approaches” (PDF). SEI Digital Library.
  75. Bondi, André B. (2000). Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance. Proceedings of the second international workshop on Software and performance – WOSP ’00. p. 195. doi:10.1145/350391.350432. ISBN 158113195X.
  76. ^ Hill, Mark D. (1990). “What is scalability?” (PDF). ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 18 (4): 18. doi:10.1145/121973.121975. S2CID 1232925. and
    Duboc, Leticia; Rosenblum, David S.; Wicks, Tony (2006). A framework for modelling and analysis of software systems scalability (PDF). Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering – ICSE ’06. p. 949. doi:10.1145/1134285.1134460. ISBN 1595933751.
  77. ^ Laudon, Kenneth Craig; Traver, Carol Guercio (2008). E-commerce: Business, Technology, Society. Pearson Prentice Hall/Pearson Education. ISBN 9780136006459.
  78. ^ “Why web-scale is the future”. Network World. 2020-02-13. Retrieved 2017-06-01.
  79. ^ Building Serverless Applications on Knative. O’Reilly Media. ISBN 9781098142049.
  80. ^ Bigley, Gregory A.; Roberts, Karlene H. (2001-12-01). “The Incident Command System: High-Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task Environments”. Academy of Management Journal. 44 (6): 1281–1299. doi:10.5465/3069401 (inactive 1 November 2024). ISSN 0001-4273.
  81. ^ Jump up to:a b c Hesham El-Rewini and Mostafa Abd-El-Barr (April 2005). Advanced Computer Architecture and Parallel Processing. John Wiley & Sons. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-471-47839-3.
  82. ^ Michael, Maged; Moreira, Jose E.; Shiloach, Doron; Wisniewski, Robert W. (March 26, 2007). Scale-up x Scale-out: A Case Study using Nutch/Lucene. 2007 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. p. 1. doi:10.1109/IPDPS.2007.370631. ISBN 978-1-4244-0909-9.
  83. ^ “Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV); Terminology for Main Concepts in NFV”. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-05-11. Retrieved 2016-01-12.
  84. ^ Sadek Drobi (January 11, 2008). “Eventual consistency by Werner Vogels”. InfoQ. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
  85. ^ Gunther, Neil (2007). Guerrilla Capacity Planning: A Tactical Approach to Planning for Highly Scalable Applications and Services. ISBN 978-3540261384.
  86. ^ “The Weak Scaling of DL_POLY 3”. STFC Computational Science and Engineering Department. Archived from the original on March 7, 2014. Retrieved March 8, 2014.
  87. Gartner. “Gartner Trend Insights report 2018” (PDF). Gartner. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-18. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
  88. ^ “Globally Distributed Content Delivery, by J. Dilley, B. Maggs, J. Parikh, H. Prokop, R. Sitaraman and B. Weihl, IEEE Internet Computing, Volume 6, Issue 5, November 2002” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2019-10-25.
  89. ^ Nygren., E.; Sitaraman R. K.; Sun, J. (2010). “The Akamai network: A platform for high-performance internet applications” (PDF). ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. 44 (3): 2–19. doi:10.1145/1842733.1842736. S2CID 207181702. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 13, 2012. Retrieved November 19, 2012. See Section 6.2: Distributing Applications to the Edge
  90. ^ Davis, A.; Parikh, J.; Weihl, W. (2004). “Edgecomputing: Extending enterprise applications to the edge of the internet”. Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters – WWW Alt. ’04. p. 180. doi:10.1145/1013367.1013397. ISBN 1581139128. S2CID 578337.
  91. ^ Gartner. “2021 Strategic Roadmap for Edge Computing”. www.gartner.com. Archived from the original on 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2021-07-11.
  92. ^ “IEEE DAC 2014 Keynote: Mobile Computing Opportunities, Challenges and Technology Drivers”. Archived from the original on 2020-07-30. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  93. ^ MIT MTL Seminar: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges Driving Architecture and Design of Next Generation Mobile Computing and IoT Devices
  94. ^ Kenn Anthony Mendoza. “Super Micro Computer introduces new systems for edge computing”. Supermicro.
  95. ^ “What is fog and edge computing?”. Capgemini Worldwide. 2017-03-02. Retrieved 2021-07-06.
  96. ^ Dolui, Koustabh; Datta, Soumya Kanti (June 2017). “Comparison of edge computing implementations: Fog computing, cloudlet and mobile edge computing”. 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/GIOTS.2017.8016213. ISBN 978-1-5090-5873-0. S2CID 11600169.
  97. ^ “Difference Between Edge Computing and Fog Computing”. GeeksforGeeks. 2021-11-27. Retrieved 2022-09-11.
  98. ^ “Data at the Edge Report”. Seagate Technology.
  99. ^ Reznik, Alex (2018-05-14). “What is Edge?”. ETSI – ETSI Blog – etsi.org. Retrieved 2019-02-19. What is ‘Edge’? The best that I can do is this: it’s anything that’s not a ‘data center cloud’.
  100. ^ Anand, B.; Edwin, A. J. Hao (January 2014). “Gamelets — Multiplayer mobile games with distributed micro-clouds”. 2014 Seventh International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU). pp. 14–20. doi:10.1109/ICMU.2014.6799051. ISBN 978-1-4799-2231-4. S2CID 10374389.
  101. ^ “Edge virtualization manages the data deluge, but can be complex | TechTarget”. IT Operations. Retrieved 2022-12-13.
  102. ^ Patrizio, Andy (2018-12-03). “IDC: Expect 175 zettabytes of data worldwide by 2025”. Network World. Retrieved 2021-07-09.
  103. ^ “What We Do and How We Got Here”. Gartner. Retrieved 2021-12-21.
  104. ^ Ivkovic, Jovan (2016-07-11). The Methods and Procedures for Accelerating Operations and Queries in Large Database Systems and Data Warehouse (Big Data Systems) (PDF). National Repository of Dissertations in Serbia (Doctoral thesis) (in Serbian and American English).
  105. ^ Jump up to:a b c Shi, Weisong; Cao, Jie; Zhang, Quan; Li, Youhuizi; Xu, Lanyu (October 2016). “Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges”. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 3 (5): 637–646. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198. S2CID 4237186.
  106. ^ Merenda, Massimo; Porcaro, Carlo; Iero, Demetrio (29 April 2020). “Edge Machine Learning for AI-Enabled IoT Devices: A Review”. Sensors. 20 (9): 2533. Bibcode:2020Senso..20.2533M. doi:10.3390/s20092533. PMC 7273223. PMID 32365645.
  107. ^ “IoT management”. Retrieved 2020-04-08.
  108. ^ Garcia Lopez, Pedro; Montresor, Alberto; Epema, Dick; Datta, Anwitaman; Higashino, Teruo; Iamnitchi, Adriana; Barcellos, Marinho; Felber, Pascal; Riviere, Etienne (30 September 2015). “Edge-centric Computing”. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 45 (5): 37–42. doi:10.1145/2831347.2831354. hdl:11572/114780.
  109. ^ Jump up to:a b c 3 Advantages of Edge Computing. Aron Brand. Medium.com. Sep 20, 2019
  110. ^ Babar, Mohammad; Sohail Khan, Muhammad (July 2021). “ScalEdge: A framework for scalable edge computing in Internet of things–based smart systems”. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 17 (7): 155014772110353. doi:10.1177/15501477211035332. ISSN 1550-1477. S2CID 236917011.
  111. ^ Liu, S.; Liu, L.; Tang, B. Wu; Wang, J.; Shi, W. (2019). “Edge Computing for Autonomous Driving: Opportunities and Challenges”. Proceedings of the IEEE. 107 (8): 1697–1716. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2019.2915983. S2CID 198311944. Archived from the original on 2021-05-26. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
  112. ^ Yu, W.; et al. (2018). “A Survey on the Edge Computing for the Internet of Things”. IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 6900-6919. arXiv:2104.01776. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3072611. S2CID 233025108. Archived from the original on 2021-05-26. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
  113. ^ Jump up to:a b Satyanarayanan, Mahadev (January 2017). “The Emergence of Edge Computing”. Computer. 50 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1109/MC.2017.9. ISSN 1558-0814. S2CID 12563598.
  114. ^ Yi, S.; Hao, Z.; Qin, Z.; Li, Q. (November 2015). “Fog Computing: Platform and Applications”. 2015 Third IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies (HotWeb). pp. 73–78. doi:10.1109/HotWeb.2015.22. ISBN 978-1-4673-9688-2. S2CID 6753944.
  115. ^ Verbelen, Tim; Simoens, Pieter; De Turck, Filip; Dhoedt, Bart (2012). “Cloudlets”. Proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Mobile cloud computing and services. ACM. pp. 29–36. doi:10.1145/2307849.2307858. hdl:1854/LU-2984272. ISBN 9781450313193. S2CID 3249347. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
  116. ^ Minh, Quy Nguyen; Nguyen, Van-Hau; Quy, Vu Khanh; Ngoc, Le Anh; Chehri, Abdellah; Jeon, Gwanggil (2022). “Edge Computing for IoT-Enabled Smart Grid: The Future of Energy”. Energies. 15 (17): 6140. doi:10.3390/en15176140. ISSN 1996-1073.
  117. ^ It’s Time to Think Beyond Cloud Computing Published by wired.com retrieved April 10, 2019
  118. ^ Taleb, Tarik; Dutta, Sunny; Ksentini, Adlen; Iqbal, Muddesar; Flinck, Hannu (March 2017). “Mobile Edge Computing Potential in Making Cities Smarter”. IEEE Communications Magazine. 55 (3): 38–43. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600249CM. S2CID 11163718. Retrieved 5 July 2019.
  119. ^ Chakraborty, T.; Datta, S. K. (November 2017). “Home automation using edge computing and Internet of Things”. 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE). pp. 47–49. doi:10.1109/ISCE.2017.8355544. ISBN 978-1-5386-2189-9. S2CID 19156163.
  120. ^ Size of the Prize: How Will Edge Computing in Space Drive Value Creation? Published by Via Satellite retrieved August 18, 2023
  121. ^ “What is edge AI?”. www.redhat.com. Retrieved 2023-10-25.
  123.  Kianpour, Mazaher; Raza, Shahid (2024). “More than malware: unmasking the hidden risk of cybersecurity regulations”. International Cybersecurity Law Review. 5: 169–212. doi:10.1365/s43439-024-00111-7. hdl:11250/3116767.
  124. ^ Jump up to:a b “Cyber: Think risk, not IT” (PDF). pwc.com. PwC Financial Services Regulatory Practice, April, 2015.
  125. ^ Jump up to:a b “DOD-Strategy-for-Operating-in-Cyberspace” (PDF).
  126. ^ Hopcraft, Rory (2018). “Effective maritime cybersecurity regulation – the case for a cyber code”. Journal of Indian Ocean Region. 14 (3): 354–366. doi:10.1080/19480881.2018.1519056. S2CID 158311827.
  127. ^ Schooner, Steven L.; Berteau, David J. (2012-03-01). Emerging Policy and Practice Issues (2011). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN 2014385.
  128. ^ Jump up to:a b Schooner, Steven; Berteau, David (2014-01-01). “Emerging Policy and Practice Issues”. GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works.
  129. ^ “Do Agencies Already Have the Authority to Issue Critical Infrastructure Protection Regulations?”. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
  130. ^ Jump up to:a b “Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act (2005; 109th Congress H.R. 29) – GovTrack.us”. GovTrack.us.
  131. ^ “Executive Order – Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity”. whitehouse.gov. 12 February 2013 – via National Archives.
  132. ^ “SECURING CYBERSPACE – President Obama Announces New Cybersecurity Legislative Proposal and Other Cybersecurity Efforts”. whitehouse.gov. 2015-01-13. Retrieved 2017-08-06 – via National Archives.
  133. ^ “FACT SHEET: Cybersecurity National Action Plan”. whitehouse.gov. 2016-02-09. Retrieved 2017-08-06 – via National Archives.
  134. ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Secrecy hampers battle for web”. Financial Times. 7 June 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  135. ^ “Executive Order – Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity”. The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. 12 February 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  136. ^ “Dedicated legislation for Cyber Security is needed: Pavan Duggal – Express Computer”. Express Computer. 31 August 2015.
  137. ^ “Standards”. ENISA website.
  138. ^ “List of Cybersecurity Standards”. GENORMA.COM.
  139. ^ “L_2013165EN.01004101.xml”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-03-08.
  140. ^ “About ENISA — ENISA”. www.enisa.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-03-08.
  141. ^ “Structure and Organisation — ENISA”. www.enisa.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-03-08.
  142. ^ Purser, Steve (2014). “Standards for Cyber Security”. In Hathaway, Melissa E. (ed.). Best Practices in Computer Network Defense: Incident Detection and Response. Nato Science for Peace and Security Series – D: Information and Communication Security. Vol. 35. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-372-8-97. ISBN 978-1-61499-372-8.
  143. ^ “Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union”. EUR Lex. 19 July 2016. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  144. ^ “The Directive on security of network and information systems (NIS Directive)”. Digital Single Market. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  145. ^ “The Network and Information Security Directive – who is in and who is out?”. The Register. 7 January 2016. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  146. ^ “NIS Directive Published: EU Member States Have Just Under Two Years to Implement – Data Protection Report”. Data Protection Report. 2016-07-21. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  147. ^ “Agreement reached on EU Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive | Deloitte Luxembourg | Technology | Insight”. Deloitte Luxembourg. Archived from the original on 2018-03-02. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  148. ^ Jump up to:a b “Network and Information Security Directive will be implemented in the UK despite Brexit vote, government confirms”. www.out-law.com. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  149. ^ “the NIS 2 directive”. digitaleurope.org. Retrieved 2021-09-29.
  150. ^ “NIS Implementation Tracker”.
  151. ^ “The EU Cybersecurity Act”. Retrieved 2019-12-06.
  152. ^ “Home Page of EU GDPR”. EU GDPR Portal. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  153. ^ Jump up to:a b “Key Changes with the General Data Protection Regulation”. EU GDPR Portal. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  154. ^ Jump up to:a b “Overview of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)”. ico.org.uk. 2017-03-03. Retrieved 2017-03-12.
  155. ^ “NIS2 Directive”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 27 March 2023.
  156. ^ “Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)”. eiopa.europa.eu/. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
  157. ^ Bertuzzi, Luca (2021-09-16). “EU chief announces cybersecurity law for connected devices”. www.euractiv.com. Retrieved 2023-01-30.
  158. ^ “Why a clear cyber policy is critical for companies”. Financial Times. 2022-11-09. Retrieved 2023-01-30.
  159. ^ “EU pitches cyber law to fix patchy Internet of Things”. POLITICO. 2022-09-15. Retrieved 2023-01-30.
  160. ^ Reidy, Diane (2019-04-15). “Away in a hack”. Law Society of Ireland. Retrieved 2024-02-19.
  161. ^ Finlay, Adam; Hughes, Ruth. “iclg.com > Practice Areas > Cybersecurity > Ireland”. iclg.com. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
  162. ^ Milinkovich, Mike. “Cyber Resilience Act: Good Intentions and Unintended Consequences”. Eclipse Foundation Blog. Eclipse Foundation Executive Director. Retrieved 11 April 2023.
  163. ^ Kolkman, Olaf (24 October 2022). “The EU’s Proposed Cyber Resilience Act Will Damage the Open Source Ecosystem”. The Internet Society. The Internet Society Principal – Internet Technology, Policy, and Advocacy. Retrieved 11 April 2023.
  164. ^ Nicholson, Deb (11 April 2023). “The EU’s Proposed CRA Law May Have Unintended Consequences for the Python Ecosystem”. Python Software Foundation Blog. Python Software Foundation. Retrieved 11 April 2023.
  165. ^ Milinkovic, Mike (16 January 2023). “European Cyber Resiliency Act: Potential Impact on the Eclipse Foundation”. Eclipse Foundation Blog. Retrieved 11 April 2023.
  166.  IEEE 802.3-2012 Clause 9.1
  167. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  168. ^ “The TCP/IP Guide – Overview Of Key Routing Protocol Concepts: Architectures, Protocol Types, Algorithms and Metrics”. www.tcpipguide.com. Retrieved 2016-02-12.
  169. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org.
  170. ^ “Hubs Versus Switches – Understand the tradeoffs” (PDF). ccontrols.com. 2002. Retrieved 2013-12-10.
  171. ^ E., Decker; A., Rijsinghani; K., McCloghrie; P., Langille. “Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges”. tools.ietf.org. Retrieved 2016-02-12.
  172. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  173. ^ Dean, Tamara (2010). Network+ Guide to Networks. Delmar. pp. 256–257.
  174. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  175. ^ “bridge router Definition from PC Magazine Encyclopedia”. www.pcmag.com. Retrieved 2016-02-12.
  176. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  177. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org. Retrieved 2021-06-20.
  178. ^ Oppliger, Rolf (May 1997). “Internet Security: FIREWALLS and BEYOND”. Communications of the ACM. 40 (5): 94. doi:10.1145/253769.253802. S2CID 15271915.
  179. ^ “ATIS Telecom Glossary”. www.atis.org. Retrieved 2021-06-20
  180. Antoine Joseph/Berry/Ingram Skilled Worker’s Solidarity, pp. 73-4, Taylor & Francis, 2000 ISBN 978-0-8153-3336-4
  181. ^ Philip S. Foner History of the Labor Movement in the United States, pp. 78-9, International Publishers Co., 1976 ISBN 978-0-7178-0388-0
  182. ^ Dirk Hoerder American Labor and Immigration History, 1877-1920s, p. 153, University of Illinois Press, 1983 ISBN 978-0-252-00963-1
  183. ^ Robert H. Wiebe Self-Rule, pp. 132-3, University of Chicago Press, 1995 ISBN 978-0-226-89562-8
  184. ^ Y. S. Brenner A Short History of Economic Progress, p. 213, Routledge, 1969 ISBN 978-0-7146-1277-5
  185. ^ Detlef Mülhberger Hitler’s Followers, p. 19, Routledge, 1991 ISBN 978-0-415-00802-0
  186. ^ Norbert Altmann/Christoph Köhler/Pamela Meil Technology and Work in German Industry, p. 279, Routledge, 1992 ISBN 978-0-415-07926-6
  187. ^ Thomas L. Friedman The World Is Flat, p. 147, Macmillan, 2007 ISBN 978-0-374-29278-2
  188. ^ “Employment-Based Immigration: Third Preference EB-3 | USCIS”. www.uscis.gov. 2020-12-02. Retrieved 2023-11-11.
  189. ^ Greenspan (2007), p. 405
  190. ^ Greenspan (2007), p. 398
  191. ^ Greenspan (2007), p. 395
  192. ^ G. Beijer Brain Drain, p. 1, Brill Archive, 1972 ISBN 978-90-247-1453-7
  193. ^ “Why People Apply for Immigration?” by Exon
  194. ^ Phillip Brown; Stuart Tannock (2009). “Education, meritocracy and the global war for talent”. Journal of Education Policy. 24 (4): 384–385. doi:10.1080/02680930802669938. S2CID 154369273.
  195. ^ Dean Baker/Geral A. Epstein/Robert Pollin Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy, p. 362, Cambridge University Press, 1998 ISBN 978-0-521-64376-4
  196. ^ Laura D. Francis (24 November 2014). “Obama Immigration Order to Impact Millions, Includes Provisions for High-Skilled Workers”. Bloomberg Bureau of National Affairs. Retrieved 13 January 2016. But flying under the radar are several administrative changes aimed at highly skilled immigrant workers and entrepreneurs, including increased job portability for immigrants with approved employment-based petitions but who can’t get a visa because of annual caps, expansion of the optional practical training program, a review of the permanent labor certification program, and guidance on L-1B intracompany transferee visas for “specialized knowledge” workers.
  197. ^ Singer, Colin R. (2012-12-17). “Canada Express Entry Immigration, 2014”. Immigration.ca. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  198. ^ International Mobility of the Highly Skilled, p. 214, OECD Publishing, 2002 ISBN 978-92-64-19689-6
  199. ^ International Mobility of the Highly Skilled. 2001-12-11. ISBN 9789264196087. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  200. ^ Adam Jolly OECD Economies and the World Today, p. 213, Kogan Page Publishers, 2003 ISBN 978-0-7494-3781-7
  201. ^ Richard S. Newfarmer Global Economic Prospects 2004, p. 158, World Bank Publications, 2003 ISBN 978-0-8213-5582-4
  202. ^ Bank, World (2003-01-01). World Bank: Global Economic Prospects, 2004. ISBN 9780821355824. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
  203. McLean, Robert; Gargani, John (2019). Scaling impact: innovation for the public good. Oxon/NY: Routledge. ISBN 9780429468025.
  204. ^ Jump up to:a b Wigboldus, Seerp; Leewis, Cees. “Towards responsible scaling up and out in agricultural development. An exploration of concepts and principles”. Discussion Paper. Centre for Development Innovation.
  205. ^ Jump up to:a b Woltering, L.; Fehlenberg, K.; Gerard, B.; Ubels, J.; Cooley, L. (November 2019). “Scaling – from “reaching many” to sustainable systems change at scale: A critical shift in mindset”. Agricultural Systems. 176: 102652. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102652.
  206. ^ Gonsalves, J (2000). Going to scale: can we bring more benefits to more people more quickly (PDF). International Institute of Rural Reconstruction.
  207. ^ (Gündel et al., 2001)[clarification needed]
  208. ^ Riddell, D; Moore, M (2015). “Scaling out, scaling up, scaling deep: advancing systemic social innovation and the learning processes to support it” (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  209. ^ Cooley, Larry; Kohl, Richard. “Scaling up from vision to large-scale change: a management framework for practitioners” (PDF). Management Services International.
  210. ^ Cooley, Larry; Linn, Johannes F. “Taking Innovations to Scale:Methods, Applications and Lessons” (PDF). USAID.
  211. ^ Kohl, Richard; Foy, Colm. “Guide to the Agricultural Scalability Assessment Tool for Assessing and Improving the Scaling Potential of Agricultural Technologies” (PDF).
  212. ^ “Scaling-up results”. IFAD.
  213. ^ “Beginning with the end in mind: planning pilot projects and other programmatic research for successful scaling up”. WHO.
  214. ^ “Guidelines on scaling-up for programme managers and planning officers” (PDF). GIZ.
  215. ^ “About PPPLab”. PPPLab.
  216. ^ PPPLab
  217. ^ Jacobs, Floortje; Ubels, Jan; Woltering, Lennart (2018). “The Scaling Scan: a practical tool to determine the potential to scale”. PPPLab & CIMMYT.
  218. BP: Workbook of historical data (xlsx), London, 2012
  219. ^ “Energy Consumption: Total energy consumption per capita”. Earth trends Database. World Resources Institute. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004. Retrieved 2011-04-21.
  220. ^ “environmental impact of energy”. European Environment Agency. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
  221. ^ Bowman, D. M. J. S; Balch, J. K; Artaxo, P; Bond, W. J; Carlson, J. M; Cochrane, M. A; d’Antonio, C. M; Defries, R. S; Doyle, J. C; Harrison, S. P; Johnston, F. H; Keeley, J. E; Krawchuk, M. A; Kull, C. A; Marston, J. B; Moritz, M. A; Prentice, I. C; Roos, C. I; Scott, A. C; Swetnam, T. W; Van Der Werf, G. R; Pyne, S. J (2009). “Fire in the Earth System”. Science. 324 (5926): 481–4. Bibcode:2009Sci…324..481B. doi:10.1126/science.1163886. PMID 19390038. S2CID 22389421.
  222. ^ “AR4 Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis — IPCC”. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
  223. ^ Kay, J. (2002). Kay, J.J. “On Complexity Theory, Exergy and Industrial Ecology: Some Implications for Construction Ecology.” Archived 6 January 2006 at the Wayback Machine In: Kibert C., Sendzimir J., Guy, B. (eds.) Construction Ecology: Nature as the Basis for Green Buildings, pp. 72–107. London: Spon Press. Retrieved on: 2009-04-01.
  224. ^ Baksh B., Fiksel J. (2003). “The Quest for Sustainability: Challenges for Process Systems Engineering” (PDF). American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal. 49 (6): 1355. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 24 August 2009.
  225. ^ “The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)”. NOAA.gov. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2024. Archived from the original on 5 October 2024.
  226. ^ “Help finding information | US EPA”. 12 August 2013.
  227. ^ Douglas Starr, “The carbon accountant. Richard Heede pins much of the responsibility for climate change on just 90 companies. Others say that’s a cop-out”, Science, volume 353, issue 6302, 26 August 2016, pages 858–861.
  228. ^ Heede, Richard (2014). “Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010”. Climatic Change. 122 (1–2): 229–241. Bibcode:2014ClCh..122..229H. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y. S2CID 10093636.
  229. ^ “Billions face climate change risk”. BBC News Science/Nature. 6 April 2007. Retrieved 22 April 2011.
  230. ^ Rabl A.; et al. (August 2005). “Final Technical Report, Version 2” (PDF). Externalities of Energy: Extension of Accounting Framework and Policy Applications. European Commission. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2012.
  231. ^ Jump up to:a b “External costs of electricity systems (graph format)”. ExternE-Pol. Technology Assessment / GaBE (Paul Scherrer Institut). 2005. Archived from the original on 1 November 2013.
  232. ^ “New research reveals the real costs of electricity in Europe” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
  233. ^ ExternE-Pol, External costs of current and advanced electricity systems, associated with emissions from the operation of power plants and with the rest of the energy chain, final technical report. Archived 15 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine See figure 9, 9b and figure 11
  234. ^ Gao, Yan (2011). “Working paper. A global analysis of deforestation due to biofuel development” (PDF). Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Retrieved 23 January 2020.
  235. ^ Rowan, Anthea (25 September 2009). “Africa’s burning charcoal problem”. BBC News Africa. Retrieved 22 April 2011.
  236. ^ “International Energy Annual 2006”. Archived from the original on 5 February 2009. Retrieved 8 February 2009.
  237. ^ Ottmar Edenhofer, King Coal and the queen of subsidies. In: Science 349, Issue 6254, (2015), 1286, doi:10.1126/science.aad0674.
  238. ^ RadTown USA | US EPA
  239. ^ Toxic Air: The Case for Cleaning Up Coal-fired Power Plants (PDF) (Report). American Lung Association. March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 9 March 2012.
  240. ^ “Environmental impacts of coal power: air pollution”. Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original on 11 November 2005. Retrieved 9 March 2012.
  241. ^ Henneman, Lucas; Choirat, Christine; Dedoussi, Irene; Dominici, Francesca; Roberts, Jessica; Zigler, Corwin (24 November 2023). “Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation”. Science. 382 (6673): 941–946. doi:10.1126/science.adf4915. ISSN 0036-8075. PMC 10870829.
  242. ^ Ritchie, Hannah; Roser, Max (28 December 2023). “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?”. Our World in Data.
  243. ^ “Coal Fatalities for 1900 Through 2016”. Arlington, VA: U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). Archived from the original on 3 October 2015. Retrieved 25 October 2017.
  244. ^ “China shifts approach to fatal coal mining accidents to ensure supply security”. MINING.COM. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
  245. ^ The Library of Congress (2006). “History of the Oil and Gas Industry”. Business and Economics Research Advisor (5/6).
  246. ^ “EPA enforcement targets flaring efficiency violations” (PDF). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1 August 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  247. ^ “Frequent, routine flaring may cause excessive, uncontrolled sulfur dioxide releases” (PDF). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1 October 2000. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  248. ^ Bautista, H.; Rahman, K.M.M. (25 January 2016). “Review On the Sundarbans Delta Oil Spill: Effects On Wildlife and Habitats”. International Research Journal. 1 (43): 93–96. doi:10.18454/IRJ.2016.43.143.
  249. ^ Bautista, H.; Rahman, K. M. M. (2016). “Effects of Crude Oil Pollution in the Tropical Rainforest Biodiversity of Ecuadorian Amazon Region”. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences. 8 (2): 249–254.
  250. ^ Eggleton, Tony (2013). A Short Introduction to Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. p. 52. ISBN 9781107618763.
  251. ^ Stohl, A.; Klimont, Z.; Eckhardt, S.; Kupiainen, K.; Chevchenko, V.P.; Kopeikin, V.M.; Novigatsky, A.N. (2013), “Black carbon in the Arctic: the underestimated role of gas flaring and residential combustion emissions”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13 (17): 8833–8855, Bibcode:2013ACP….13.8833S, doi:10.5194/acp-13-8833-2013, hdl:11250/2383886
  252. ^ Michael Stanley (10 December 2018). “Gas flaring: An industry practice faces increasing global attention” (PDF). World Bank. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  253. ^ “Air pollution from vehicle-tailpipe emissions and diagnostic approaches through cyber–physical platform – a review”.
  254. ^ Heede, R. (2014). “Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010”. Climatic Change. 122 (1–2): 229–241. Bibcode:2014ClCh..122..229H. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y.
  255. ^ Jump up to:a b “Data and Statistics: CO₂ emissions by energy source, World 1990-2017”. International Energy Agency (Paris). Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  256. ^ Hannah Ritchie; Max Roser (2020). “CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: CO₂ Emissions by Fuel”. Our World in Data. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  257. ^ “Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019: The latest trends in energy and emissions in 2018”. International Energy Agency (Paris). 1 March 2019. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  258. ^ “Methane Tracker – Methane from oil and gas”. International Energy Agency (Paris). 1 January 2020. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  259. ^ Jump up to:a b “Tracking Fuel Supply – Methane emissions from oil and gas”. International Energy Agency (Paris). 1 November 2019. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  260. ^ Alvarez, R.A.; et al. (13 July 2018). “Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain”. Science. 361 (6398): 186–188. Bibcode:2018Sci…361..186A. doi:10.1126/science.aar7204. PMC 6223263. PMID 29930092.
  261. ^ “Methane Tracker – Country and regional estimates”. International Energy Agency (Paris). 1 November 2019. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  262. ^ “Methane Tracker – Analysis”. International Energy Agency (Paris). 1 November 2019. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  263. ^ Vaclav Smil (29 February 2016). “To Get Wind Power You Need Oil”. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  264. ^ Amory Lovins (18 September 2018). “How big is the energy efficiency resource?”. Environmental Research Letters. 13 (9). IOP Science: 090401. Bibcode:2018ERL….13i0401L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aad965.
  265. ^ Asim, Nilofar; Badiei, Marzieh; Torkashvand, Mohammad; Mohammad, Masita; Alghoul, Mohammad A.; Gasaymeh, Shawkat S.; Sopian, Kamaruzzaman (15 February 2021). “Wastes from the petroleum industries as sustainable resource materials in construction sectors: Opportunities, limitations, and directions”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 284: 125459. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125459. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 230552246.
  266. ^ twall (8 December 2022). “What oil and gas companies are doing to promote environmental sustainability”. Plant Engineering. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
  267. ^ Natural Gas and the Environment Archived 3 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  268. ^ IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (Working Group III Report, Chapter 4)
  269. ^ Poulakis, Evangelos; Philippopoulos, Constantine (2017). “Photocatalytic treatment of automotive exhaust emissions”. Chemical Engineering Journal. 309: 178–186. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.030.
  270. ^ Schmutz, Stefan; Moog, Otto (2018), Schmutz, Stefan; Sendzimir, Jan (eds.), “Dams: Ecological Impacts and Management”, Riverine Ecosystem Management, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 111–127, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_6, ISBN 978-3-319-73249-7
  271. ^ Jump up to:a b International Panel on Fissile Materials (September 2010). “The Uncertain Future of Nuclear Energy” (PDF). Research Report 9. p. 1.[permanent dead link]
  272. ^ “Importance of Saving Energy. Energy Conservation Benefits”. TRVST. 23 November 2019. Retrieved 27 November 2020.
  273. ^ “2022-2023 EIB Climate Survey, part 1 of 2: Majority of Europeans say the war in Ukraine and high energy prices should accelerate the green transition”. EIB.org. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
  274. ^ “Energy poverty”. energy.ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 17 November 2022.
  275. Mirzagayeva, Shamiya; Aslanov, Heydar (2022-12-15). “The digitalization process: what has it led to, and what can we expect in the future?” (PDF). Metafizika. 5 (4): 10–21. eISSN 2617-751X. ISSN 2616-6879. OCLC 1117709579. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-11-12. Retrieved 2022-10-14.
  276. ^ Jump up to:a b Vial, Gregory (2019). “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda”. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 28 (2): 118–144. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003. S2CID 115202292.
  277. ^ Warner, Karl S. R.; Wäger, Maximilian (2019-06-01). “Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal”. Long Range Planning. 52 (3): 326–349. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001. ISSN 0024-6301. S2CID 158197061.
  278. ^ Schmarzo, Bill (31 May 2017). “What is Digital Transformation?”. Archived from the original on 2019-11-30. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
  279. ^ Wren, Hannah (1 December 2020). “What is digital transformation? Definition, Examples, Main Areas”. Archived from the original on 2020-12-02. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  280. ^ Jump up to:a b Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, Digitalisation in procurement and supply 2020, accessed 13 August 2023
  281. ^ Kretschmer, Tobias; Khashabi, Pooyan (August 2020). “Digital Transformation and Organization Design: An Integrated Approach”. California Management Review. 62 (4): 86–104. doi:10.1177/0008125620940296. ISSN 0008-1256. S2CID 221042306.
  282. ^ KPMG, Future-proof procurement – Now or never: the big procurement transformation, published April 2016, accessed on 20 June 2024
  283. ^ McGrath, Rita; McManus, Ryan (2020-05-01). “Discovery-Driven Digital Transformation”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Retrieved 2024-03-26.
  284. ^ Aleksej Heinze; Marie Griffiths; Alex Fenton; Gordon Fletcher (2018). “Knowledge exchange partnership leads to digital transformation at Hydro-X Water Treatment, Ltd”. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. 37 (4): 6–13. doi:10.1002/JOE.21859. ISSN 1932-2054. Wikidata Q56622208.
  285. ^ Westerman, George; et al. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press. ISBN 9781625272478.
  286. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Wamba, Maciel M. Queiroz, Samuel Fosso (2022-10-12). Managing the Digital Transformation: Aligning Technologies, Business Models, and Operations. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781003226468. ISBN 978-1-003-22646-8.
  287. ^ McConnell, Jane (28 August 2015). “The Company Cultures That Help (or Hinder) Digital Transformation”. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  288. ^ Matt, Christian; Hess, Thomas; Benlian, Alexander (2015). “Digital Transformation Strategies”. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 57 (5): 339–343. doi:10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5. S2CID 30892786.
  289. ^ Hess T, Matt C, Benlian A, Wiesböck F. Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive. 2016;15(2):123-139.
  290. ^ Hartl, Eva and Hess, Thomas, (2019). “IT PROJECTS IN DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: A SOCIO-TECHNICAL JOURNEY TOWARDS TECHNOCHANGE”. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8–14, 2019. ISBN 978-1-7336325-0-8 Research Papers. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/162
  291. ^ Butt, Aurangzeab; Imran, Faisal; Kantola, Jussi; Helo, Petri (2021). “Cultural Preparation for Digital Transformation of Industrial Organizations: A Multi-case Exploration of Socio-technical Systems”. Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 273. pp. 457–463. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80713-9_58. ISBN 978-3-030-80712-2. S2CID 237298363.
  292. ^ Kane, Gerald; et al. (14 July 2015). “Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation”. MIT Sloan Management Review. Archived from the original on 2015-07-17. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  293. ^ Bughin, Jacques; et al. (9 February 2017). “The case for digital reinvention”. McKinsey Digital. Archived from the original on 2017-02-09. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  294. ^ Jump up to:a b c “EIB Investment Report 2020-2021”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 2021-11-15.
  295. ^ “Unlocking Private Investment in Climate Adaptation and Resilience”. World Bank. March 4, 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-15.
  296. ^ “Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth” (PDF). OECD. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-05-30.
  297. ^ Galea-Pace, S. (17 May 2020). “CIPS: Digitalisation in Procurement and Supply 2019”. Supply Chain Digital. Retrieved 13 August 2023.
  298. ^ European Investment Bank. (2022-01-12). EIB Investment Report 2021/2022: Recovery as a springboard for change. European Investment Bank. doi:10.2867/82061. ISBN 978-92-861-5155-2.
  299. ^ “EIB Investment Report 2020-2021”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 2021-11-15.
  300. ^ “EIB Corporate Digitalisation Index 2020/2021: Most EU countries are trailing the United States in digitalisation”. European Investment Bank. 21 July 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-23.
  301. ^ European Investment Bank. (2021-11-18). Finance in Africa: for green, smart and inclusive private sector development. European Investment Bank. doi:10.2867/38529. ISBN 978-92-861-5063-0.
  302. ^ Jump up to:a b European Investment Bank.; Ipsos Public Affairs. (2022-11-08). EIB Investment Survey 2022 – EU overview. European Investment Bank. p. 14. doi:10.2867/488028. ISBN 978-92-861-5397-6.
  303. ^ “Digital economy and society statistics – enterprises”. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  304. ^ “COVID-19 digital transformation & technology | McKinsey”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  305. ^ “Europe’s migration to digital services during COVID-19 | McKinsey”. www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  306. ^ PricewaterhouseCoopers. “Business needs a tighter strategy for remote work”. PwC. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  307. ^ Barney, Jay (March 1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”. Journal of Management. 17 (1): 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108. ISSN 0149-2063.
  308. ^ Helfat, Constance E.; Peteraf, Margaret A. (October 2003). “The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles”. Strategic Management Journal. 24 (10): 997–1010. doi:10.1002/smj.332. ISSN 0143-2095.
  309. ^ Bordeleau, Fanny-Ève; Santa-Eulalia, Luis Antonio; Mosconi, Elaine (2021-01-05). Digital Transformation Framework: Creating Sensing, Smart, Sustainable and Social (S^4) Organisations. hdl:10125/71176. ISBN 978-0-9981331-4-0.
  310. ^ Alojail, Mohammed; Khan, Surbhi Bhatia (January 2023). “Impact of Digital Transformation toward Sustainable Development”. Sustainability. 15 (20): 14697. doi:10.3390/su152014697. ISSN 2071-1050.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *